It’s no secret at this point that I’m a huge fan of Linklater’s “Before” series. I’ve written essays on the first two brilliant films, Before Sunrise and Before Sunset. I’ve even declared my affinity for Julie Delpy in my essay on her wonderfully screwball 2 Days in New York. So perhaps I’m already coming into this newest addition to the Before series with rose-colored glasses on. At this point I’m not really sure I’d ever have a negative reaction to any of these films. Why? I simply like these people, Celine and Jesse far too much to not enjoy hanging out with them and seeing what they’re up to every 9-10 years. With this third film, the full force and weight of accumulated fictional stories of these two characters, coupled with our growing cinematic memories of them (and our own simultaneous ways in which we relate to their experiences) are beginning to take on a life of their own. Although it is the 3rd film in the series, it’s actually beginning to feel less like a series and more like one long film. It’s hard to imagine now any of the films by themselves, as each of them comment upon, build upon, and re imagine elements of each on an ongoing basis. To say which one is better is almost sacrilege to me….they’re all really pieces of one story.
Spoilers ahead….Before Midnight continues the saga and twisting/turning
relationship of Celine and Jesse, two young people we met back in 1995 in
Before Sunrise, as they spent a night together falling in love, before parting.
They of course found each other again 9 years later in Before Sunset,
elaborating on their life stories and how they diverged and joined together
again. Now in Before Midnight we find them in Greece on holiday at the age of
about 41. They’ve been a couple together for 9 years (haven’t married) and have
twin girls. Jesse is still a writer and Celine continues her political involvement
and activism. We follow them for an afternoon, evening, and night in which they
chat about current parenting challenges, career challenges and relationship
challenges. They engage in a robust dinner discussion at the villa where they
are staying with other guests. We follow them on a long walk through Greek
ruins and a nearby town on their way to a hotel stay that has been gifted to
them as a break from their kids by another couple, and finally we witness an
epic argument in the denouement at the hotel room as they discuss regrets about
the past, dissatisfaction of the current state, apprehension on the part of
Celine regarding Jesse’s wish to be involved in his son’s life (from a previous
marriage), how to reconcile these wishes with Celine’s desire to take her dream
job and ultimately questions of whether Celine and Jesse still in fact love
each other.
Continuing the sharp and crackling dialogue from the previous two films,
it’s clear that Linklater, Delpy and Hawke spend a good deal of time fleshing
out the script. According to some articles that I’ve read, they take current
experiences in their life and put them into the script and into their
characters until things come together in a way that they’re all comfortable
with. It’s clear that Celine and Jesse are who we thought they were. If we saw
Celine in prior films as an independent feminist with high aspirations who can
be sexually headstrong, but has a self-consciousness that makes her paranoid at
times, it’s comforting to know that’s who she still is. If we saw Jesse as a
hopeless romantic, who idealized love,
who had a perpetual boyishness about him and an almost too-honest
approach, it’s who he still is now. This continuity of characterization both
through mannerisms and through their speech is what ties all of these films and
moments together. The script is dense with information as usual. In
brief,seemingly off-handed moments, we get glimpses and pieces of information
that help us as the audience piece the entire previous 9 years together. The
instances are almost too numerous to count: moments that explain their
reuniting, Jesse’s divorce, Celine’s pregnancy, their living in New York and then Paris etc. etc. but all of this is handled so deftly that it
avoids obviousness. This film, even more than the others, is woven with a
biting and sarcastic wit throughout. Even in distressing moments, like the
final argument, there is a startling and darkly comic streak running through,
as often the jokes are at the other’s expense this time, whereas in the other
two films, their jokes often avoided getting personal as they were still trying
to impress each other. Here, they are in a full fledged relationship and they
know each other well. So instead of just getting to know one another, the
script allows now for deeper reflection on aging, parenting, death, career, the
concept of love, marriage and lasting relationships, the concept of the self, the
divide between men and women. When one considers the amount of information told
through words here, the depth of characterization expressed through the words
and also the pessimistic comedic strain and the damaging relational blows
struck, it’s hard not to stand up and applaud the writing. It’s probably going
to be my favorite screenplay of the year. Even more than in the previous films, the passing of the years and seasons is of high importance, with Celine and Jesse even commenting on how they demark time in their own minds. In this way, the elegance with which the film broaches topics of love coinciding with mortality has taken on a bitter sweetness that reaches a sort of pinnacle.
I think my favorite thing of all about this film and actually the entire
series itself, is the fact that I simply ENJOY spending time with Celine and
Jesse. I really like them and could watch them do anything for any period of
time together. This fits my definition of the hang-out movie. I simply love
watching them interact and feel like I know them as an actual people. This type of
pay-off does not come without significant investment. It’s clear that
Linklater, Delpy and Hawke come at this incredibly serious about the whole
endeavor. It never feels forced, maligned or insignificant. But they approach
the concept of each new film with a high degree of dedication and respect for
the characters, the films, and the audience who watches. They all seem fully
invested in how these films turn out and are fully committed to keeping these
films as honest as possible. It seems that Before Midnight is getting supreme amounts of acclaim, to the degree that they
have not seen before with the previous two. Any praise they get, surely has become cumulative as
their investment in this concept of Celine and Jesse as time passes, has been
sustained so remarkably it’s time to recognize their efforts. If they never
make another film, I will feel that these 3 films are complete together. But if
they do make another one, I will be first in line to see it.
2 comments:
Yep, Jon I have indeed long known your abiding affinity for Lulie Delpy and for the first two critically-praised entries in this venerated series. I think you also may have remembered that I have never been a fan, but have undergone shock treatments to ascertain what my problems might be. Liking the films is one thing, but validating that favorable regard with this kind of analytical brilliance is quite another. I have resolved to see the film soon, and at that time will again avail myself of yet another superlative film essay at FILMS WORTH WATCHING.
Thanks for the support Sam! I'm hoping you like this new one. It's a little darker and more troubling for sure and perhaps that will make it more palatable for you.
Post a Comment